Best NBi code snippet using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
NumericComparerTest.cs
Source: NumericComparerTest.cs
...59 var result = comparer.Compare(new decimal(1), "2.0");60 Assert.That(result.AreEqual, Is.False);61 }62 [Test]63 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()64 {65 var comparer = new NumericComparer();66 var result = comparer.Compare(new decimal(1), 1.5, 1, SideTolerance.Both);67 Assert.That(result.AreEqual, Is.True);68 }69 [Test]70 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd2dot5Double_False()71 {72 var comparer = new NumericComparer();73 var result = comparer.Compare(new decimal(1), 2.5, 1, SideTolerance.Both);74 Assert.That(result.AreEqual, Is.False);75 }76 [Test]77 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5String_True()...
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;2using NUnit.Framework;3using System;4using System.Collections.Generic;5using System.Linq;6using System.Text;7using System.Threading.Tasks;8{9 {10 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()11 {12 var comparer = new NumericComparer();13 var x = 1m;14 var y = 1.5d;15 var result = comparer.Compare(x, y);16 Assert.That(result, Is.True);17 }18 }19}
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;7{8 {9 static void Main(string[] args)10 {11 NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();12 Console.ReadLine();13 }14 }15}16Error 1 The type or namespace name 'NBi' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) C:\Users\user1\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\NBiTest\NBiTest\Program.cs 4 7 NBiTest
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;2var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();3test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();4using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;5var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();6test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();7using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;8var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();9test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();10using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;11var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();12test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();13using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;14var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();15test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();16using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;17var test = new NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer.NumericComparerTest();18test.Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True();19using NBi.Testing.Core.Scalar.Comparer;
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NUnit.Framework;7using NBi.Core.Scalar.Comparer;8using NBi.Core.Scalar.Resolver;9using NBi.Core.Calculation.Predicate.Numeric;10{11 {12 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()13 {14 var comparer = new NumericComparer(new NumericPredicateFactory(), new NumericResolverFactory());15 var x = new DecimalResolver(1);16 var y = new DoubleResolver(1.5);17 Assert.That(comparer.Compare(x.Execute(), y.Execute()), Is.True);18 }19 }20}
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NBi.Core.Scalar.Comparer;7using NUnit.Framework;8{9 {10 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()11 {12 var comparer = new NumericComparer();13 Assert.That(comparer.Compare(1m, 1.5d), Is.True);14 }15 }16}17using System;18using System.Collections.Generic;19using System.Linq;20using System.Text;21using System.Threading.Tasks;22using NBi.Core.Scalar.Comparer;23using NUnit.Framework;24{25 {26 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()27 {28 var comparer = new NumericComparer();29 Assert.That(comparer.Compare(1m, 1.5d), Is.True);30 }31 }32}33using System;34using System.Collections.Generic;35using System.Linq;36using System.Text;37using System.Threading.Tasks;38using NBi.Core.Scalar.Comparer;39using NUnit.Framework;40{41 {42 public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()43 {44 var comparer = new NumericComparer();45 Assert.That(comparer.Compare(1m, 1.5d), Is.True);46 }47 }48}
Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True
Using AI Code Generation
1public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()2{3 var comparer = new NumericComparer();4 comparer.Setup(1, ComparisonType.Equal, 1.5);5 var x = 1;6 var y = 1.5;7 var expected = true;8 var actual = comparer.Compare(x, y);9 Assert.That(actual, Is.EqualTo(expected));10}11public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()12{13 var comparer = new NumericComparer();14 comparer.Setup(1, ComparisonType.Equal, 1.5);15 var x = 1;16 var y = 1.5;17 var expected = false;18 var actual = comparer.Compare(x, y);19 Assert.That(actual, Is.EqualTo(expected));20}21public void Compare_1DecimalAnd1dot5Double_True()22{23 var comparer = new NumericComparer();24 comparer.Setup(1, ComparisonType.Equal, 1.5);25 var x = 1;26 var y = 1.5;27 var expected = false;28 var actual = comparer.Compare(x, y);29 Assert.That(actual, Is.Not.EqualTo(expected));30}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
“Test frequently and early.” If you’ve been following my testing agenda, you’re probably sick of hearing me repeat that. However, it is making sense that if your tests detect an issue soon after it occurs, it will be easier to resolve. This is one of the guiding concepts that makes continuous integration such an effective method. I’ve encountered several teams who have a lot of automated tests but don’t use them as part of a continuous integration approach. There are frequently various reasons why the team believes these tests cannot be used with continuous integration. Perhaps the tests take too long to run, or they are not dependable enough to provide correct results on their own, necessitating human interpretation.
In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.
The fact is not alien to us anymore that cross browser testing is imperative to enhance your application’s user experience. Enhanced knowledge of popular and highly acclaimed testing frameworks goes a long way in developing a new app. It holds more significance if you are a full-stack developer or expert programmer.
API (Application Programming Interface) is a set of definitions and protocols for building and integrating applications. It’s occasionally referred to as a contract between an information provider and an information user establishing the content required from the consumer and the content needed by the producer.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!