How to use Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation method of NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupExistsAnalyzerTest class

Best NBi code snippet using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupExistsAnalyzerTest.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation

LookupExistsAnalyzerTest.cs

Source: LookupExistsAnalyzerTest.cs Github

copy

Full Screen

...69 var violations = referencer.Execute(child, reference);70 Assert.That(violations.Count(), Is.EqualTo(0));71 }72 [Test]73 public void Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation()74 {75 var child = BuildDataTable(new[] { "Key0", "Key1" }, new object[] { 0, 1 });76 var reference = BuildDataTable(new[] { "Key0", "Key2", "Key2", "Key0", "Key2" }, new object[] { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 });77 var referencer = new LookupExistsAnalyzer(BuildColumnMapping(1));78 var violations = referencer.Execute(child, reference);79 Assert.That(violations.Count(), Is.EqualTo(1));80 }81 [Test]82 public void Execute_MultipleKeysreferenceLargerThanCandidateDuplicateKeys_NoViolation()83 {84 var child = BuildDataTable(new[] { "Key0", "Key1" }, new[] { "Foo", "Bar" }, new object[] { 0, 1 });85 var reference = BuildDataTable(new[] { "Key0", "Key1", "Key2" }, new[] { "Foo", "Bar", "Bar" }, new object[] { 1, 2, 3 });86 var referencer = new LookupExistsAnalyzer(BuildColumnMapping(2));87 var violations = referencer.Execute(child, reference);...

Full Screen

Full Screen

Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;7{8 {9 static void Main(string[] args)10 {11 LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();12 test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();

Full Screen

Full Screen

Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;2LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();3test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();4using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;5LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();6test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();7using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;8LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();9test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();10using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;11LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();12test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();13using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;14LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();15test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();16using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;17LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();18test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();19using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;20LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();21test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();22using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;23LookupExistsAnalyzerTest test = new LookupExistsAnalyzerTest();24test.Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation();25using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;

Full Screen

Full Screen

Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;7using NUnit.Framework;8{9 {10 public void Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation()11 {12 var analyzer = new LookupExistsAnalyzer();13 var lookup = new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.Lookup();14 lookup.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupColumn("col1", 0));15 lookup.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupColumn("col2", 1));16 lookup.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupColumn("col3", 2));17 lookup.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupRow(new object[] { 1, 2, 3 }));18 lookup.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupRow(new object[] { 4, 5, 6 }));19 lookup.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupRow(new object[] { 7, 8, 9 }));20 var result = new NBi.Core.ResultSet.ResultSet();21 result.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Column("col1", typeof(Int32)));22 result.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Column("col2", typeof(Int32)));23 result.Columns.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Column("col3", typeof(Int32)));24 result.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Row(new object[] { 1, 2, 3 }));25 result.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Row(new object[] { 4, 5, 6 }));26 result.Rows.Add(new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Row(new object[] { 7, 8, 9 }));27 var args = new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupExistsArgs(lookup, result, new NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup.LookupExistsArgs.LookupExistsArgsOptions());28 analyzer.Execute(args);29 Assert.That(analyzer.Violations.Count(), Is.EqualTo(0));30 }31 }32}33I have created a new class in the NBi.Testing.Core.ResultSet.Lookup namespace and added a new test method to test the missing item in the result set. The test method is named Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation() and it is decorated with the Test attribute. The test method is defined as follows:

Full Screen

Full Screen

Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation

Using AI Code Generation

copy

Full Screen

1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using NBi.Core.ResultSet.Lookup;4using NBi.Core.ResultSet;5using NBi.Core.Calculation;6using NUnit.Framework;7using System.Data;8using Moq;9{10 {11 public void Execute_MissingItem_NoViolation()12 {13 var rs = new ResultSet();14 rs.Columns.AddRange(new[] { new ResultSetColumn("Id1", "System.Int32"), new ResultSetColumn("Id2", "System.Int32") });15 rs.Load(new[] { new object[] { 1, 1 }, new object[] { 2, 2 }, new object[] { 3, 3 } });16 var lookup = new ResultSet();17 lookup.Columns.AddRange(new[] { new ResultSetColumn("Id1", "System.Int32"), new ResultSetColumn("Id2", "System.Int32") });18 lookup.Load(new[] { new object[] { 1, 1 }, new object[] { 2, 2 }, new object[] { 3, 3 } });19 var rs2 = new ResultSet();20 rs2.Columns.AddRange(new[] { new ResultSetColumn("Id1", "System.Int32"), new ResultSetColumn("Id2", "System.Int32") });21 rs2.Load(new[] { new object[] { 1, 1 }, new object[] { 2, 2 }, new object[] { 3, 3 } });22 var lookup2 = new ResultSet();23 lookup2.Columns.AddRange(new[] { new ResultSetColumn("Id1", "System.Int32"), new ResultSetColumn("Id2", "System.Int32") });24 lookup2.Load(new[] { new object[] { 1, 1 }, new object[] { 2, 2 }, new object[] { 3, 3 } });25 var analyzer = new LookupExistsAnalyzer(rs, lookup);26 var analyzer2 = new LookupExistsAnalyzer(rs2, lookup2);27 var result = analyzer.Execute();28 var result2 = analyzer2.Execute();29 Assert.That(result, Is.Empty);30 Assert.That(result2, Is.Empty);31 }32 }33}

Full Screen

Full Screen

Blogs

Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:

Test Optimization for Continuous Integration

“Test frequently and early.” If you’ve been following my testing agenda, you’re probably sick of hearing me repeat that. However, it is making sense that if your tests detect an issue soon after it occurs, it will be easier to resolve. This is one of the guiding concepts that makes continuous integration such an effective method. I’ve encountered several teams who have a lot of automated tests but don’t use them as part of a continuous integration approach. There are frequently various reasons why the team believes these tests cannot be used with continuous integration. Perhaps the tests take too long to run, or they are not dependable enough to provide correct results on their own, necessitating human interpretation.

Fault-Based Testing and the Pesticide Paradox

In some sense, testing can be more difficult than coding, as validating the efficiency of the test cases (i.e., the ‘goodness’ of your tests) can be much harder than validating code correctness. In practice, the tests are just executed without any validation beyond the pass/fail verdict. On the contrary, the code is (hopefully) always validated by testing. By designing and executing the test cases the result is that some tests have passed, and some others have failed. Testers do not know much about how many bugs remain in the code, nor about their bug-revealing efficiency.

13 Best Java Testing Frameworks For 2023

The fact is not alien to us anymore that cross browser testing is imperative to enhance your application’s user experience. Enhanced knowledge of popular and highly acclaimed testing frameworks goes a long way in developing a new app. It holds more significance if you are a full-stack developer or expert programmer.

A Step-By-Step Guide To Cypress API Testing

API (Application Programming Interface) is a set of definitions and protocols for building and integrating applications. It’s occasionally referred to as a contract between an information provider and an information user establishing the content required from the consumer and the content needed by the producer.

Automation Testing Tutorials

Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.

LambdaTest Learning Hubs:

YouTube

You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.

Try LambdaTest Now !!

Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!

Next-Gen App & Browser Testing Cloud

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

NotHelpful