Best NSpec code snippet using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions.AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
when_async_after_contains_exception.cs
...10 [Category("RunningSpecs")]11 [Category("Async")]12 public class when_async_after_contains_exception : when_running_specs13 {14 class AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass : nspec15 {16 void method_level_context()17 {18 afterAsync = async () =>19 {20 await Task.Delay(0);21 throw new AfterException();22 };23 it["should fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () =>24 {25 ExamplesRun.Add("should fail this example because of afterAsync");26 Assert.That(true, Is.True);27 };28 it["should also fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () =>29 {30 ExamplesRun.Add("should also fail this example because of afterAsync");31 Assert.That(true, Is.True);32 };33 it["preserves exception from same level it"] = () =>34 {35 ExamplesRun.Add("preserves exception from same level it");36 throw new ItException();37 };38 context["exception thrown by both afterAsync and nested before"] = () =>39 {40 before = () => { throw new BeforeException(); };41 it["preserves exception from nested before"] = () =>42 {43 ExamplesRun.Add("preserves exception from nested before");44 Assert.That(true, Is.True);45 };46 };47 context["exception thrown by both afterAsync and nested act"] = () =>48 {49 act = () => { throw new ActException(); };50 it["preserves exception from nested act"] = () =>51 {52 ExamplesRun.Add("preserves exception from nested act");53 Assert.That(true, Is.True);54 };55 };56 context["exception thrown by both afterAsync and nested it"] = () =>57 {58 it["preserves exception from nested it"] = () => 59 {60 ExamplesRun.Add("preserves exception from nested it");61 throw new ItException();62 };63 };64 context["exception thrown by both afterAsync and nested after"] = () =>65 {66 it["preserves exception from nested after"] = () =>67 {68 ExamplesRun.Add("preserves exception from nested after");69 Assert.That(true, Is.True);70 };71 after = () => { throw new AfterException(); };72 };73 }74 public static List<string> ExamplesRun = new List<string>();75 }76 [SetUp]77 public void setup()78 {79 Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass));80 }81 [Test]82 public void the_example_level_failure_should_indicate_a_context_failure()83 {84 classContext.AllExamples()85 .Where(e => !new []86 {87 "preserves exception from same level it",88 "preserves exception from nested it",89 }.Contains(e.Spec))90 .Should().OnlyContain(e => e.Exception is ExampleFailureException);91 }92 [Test]93 public void examples_with_only_after_async_failure_should_fail_because_of_after_async()94 {95 classContext.AllExamples()96 .Where(e => new []97 {98 "should fail this example because of afterAsync",99 "should also fail this example because of afterAsync",100 }.Contains(e.Spec))101 .Should().OnlyContain(e => e.Exception.InnerException is AfterException);102 }103 [Test]104 public void it_should_throw_exception_from_same_level_it_not_from_after_async()105 {106 TheExample("preserves exception from same level it")107 .Exception.Should().BeOfType<ItException>();108 }109 [Test]110 public void it_should_throw_exception_from_nested_before_not_from_after_async()111 {112 TheExample("preserves exception from nested before")113 .Exception.InnerException.Should().BeOfType<BeforeException>();114 }115 [Test]116 public void it_should_throw_exception_from_nested_act_not_from_after_async()117 {118 TheExample("preserves exception from nested act")119 .Exception.InnerException.Should().BeOfType<ActException>();120 }121 [Test]122 public void it_should_throw_exception_from_nested_it_not_from_after_async()123 {124 TheExample("preserves exception from nested it")125 .Exception.Should().BeOfType<ItException>();126 }127 [Test]128 public void it_should_throw_exception_from_nested_after_not_from_after_async()129 {130 TheExample("preserves exception from nested after")131 .Exception.InnerException.Should().BeOfType<AfterException>();132 }133 [Test]134 public void examples_should_fail_for_formatter()135 {136 formatter.WrittenExamples.Should().OnlyContain(e => e.Failed);137 }138 [Test]139 public void examples_body_should_still_run()140 {141 string[] expecteds = new[]142 {143 "should fail this example because of afterAsync",144 "should also fail this example because of afterAsync",145 "preserves exception from same level it",146 "preserves exception from nested act",147 "preserves exception from nested it",148 "preserves exception from nested after",149 };150 AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass.ExamplesRun.ShouldBeEquivalentTo(expecteds);151 }152 }153}...
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;2using NUnit.Framework;3using System;4using System.Threading.Tasks;5{6 [Category("AsyncAfterThrowsSpec")]7 {8 {9 void method_level_context()10 {11 afterAsync = async () =>12 {13 await Task.Delay(0);14 throw new Exception("afterAsync");15 };16 it["should fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");17 it["should also fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");18 }19 }20 public void should_fail_both_examples()21 {22 Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass));23 ExampleRunsWithException("should fail this example because of afterAsync", "afterAsync");24 ExampleRunsWithException("should also fail this example because of afterAsync", "afterAsync");25 }26 }27}28using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;29using NUnit.Framework;30using System;31using System.Threading.Tasks;32{33 [Category("AsyncBeforeThrowsSpec")]34 {35 {36 void method_level_context()37 {38 beforeAsync = async () =>39 {40 await Task.Delay(0);41 throw new Exception("beforeAsync");42 };43 it["should fail this example because of beforeAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");44 it["should also fail this example because of beforeAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");45 }46 }47 public void should_fail_both_examples()48 {49 Run(typeof(AsyncBeforeThrowsSpecClass));50 ExampleRunsWithException("should fail this example because of beforeAsync", "beforeAsync");51 ExampleRunsWithException("should also fail this example because of beforeAsync", "beforeAsync");52 }53 }54}
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;2using System;3using System.Threading.Tasks;4{5 {6 void method_level_context()7 {8 afterAsync = async () =>9 {10 await Task.Delay(1);11 throw new Exception("after");12 };13 it["should fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");14 it["should also fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");15 }16 }17}18using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;19using System;20using System.Threading.Tasks;21{22 {23 void method_level_context()24 {25 afterAsync = async () =>26 {27 await Task.Delay(1);28 throw new Exception("after");29 };30 it["should fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");31 it["should also fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");32 }33 }34}35using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;36using System;37using System.Threading.Tasks;38{39 {40 void method_level_context()41 {42 afterAsync = async () =>43 {44 await Task.Delay(1);45 throw new Exception("after");46 };47 it["should fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");48 it["should also fail this example because of after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");49 }50 }51}52using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;53using System;54using System.Threading.Tasks;55{
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;2using NUnit.Framework;3using System;4using System.Collections.Generic;5using System.Linq;6using System.Text;7using System.Threading.Tasks;8{9 {10 public void AsyncAfterThrowsSpec()11 {12 var specInstance = new AsyncAfterThrowsSpec();13 var results = specInstance.Run();14 results.Failures().Count().should_be(1);15 results.Failures().First().Exception.Message.should_be("AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass.AsyncAfterThrowsSpec: AfterAll");16 }17 }18}19using NUnit.Framework;20using NSpec.Domain;21using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;22using System;23using System.Collections.Generic;24using System.Linq;25using System.Text;26using System.Threading.Tasks;27{28 {29 public void AsyncAfterThrowsSpec()30 {31 var specInstance = new AsyncAfterThrowsSpec();32 var results = specInstance.Run();33 results.Failures().Count().should_be(1);34 results.Failures().First().Exception.Message.should_be("AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass.AsyncAfterThrowsSpec: AfterAll");35 }36 }37}38using Xunit;39using NSpec.Domain;40using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;41using System;42using System.Collections.Generic;43using System.Linq;44using System.Text;45using System.Threading.Tasks;46{47 {48 public void AsyncAfterThrowsSpec()49 {50 var specInstance = new AsyncAfterThrowsSpec();51 var results = specInstance.Run();52 results.Failures().Count().should_be(1);53 results.Failures().First().Exception.Message.should_be("AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass.AsyncAfterThrowsSpec: AfterAll");54 }55 }56}57using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;58using NSpec.Domain;
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;2using System.Threading.Tasks;3{4 [Tag("async")]5 {6 void given_async_after_throws()7 {8 it["fails async after"] = () => Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass)).ShouldFail();9 }10 }11}12using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;13using System.Threading.Tasks;14{15 [Tag("async")]16 {17 void given_async_after_throws()18 {19 it["fails async after"] = () => Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass)).ShouldFail();20 }21 }22}23using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;24using System.Threading.Tasks;25{26 [Tag("async")]27 {28 void given_async_after_throws()29 {30 it["fails async after"] = () => Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass)).ShouldFail();31 }32 }33}34using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;35using System.Threading.Tasks;36{37 [Tag("async")]38 {39 void given_async_after_throws()40 {41 it["fails async after"] = () => Run(typeof(AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass)).ShouldFail();42 }43 }44}45using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;46using System.Threading.Tasks;47{48 [Tag("async")]49 {50 void given_async_after_throws()51 {
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;2class describe_async_after_throws : nspec {3 void when_async_after_throws() {4 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");5 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");6 context["AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass"] = () => {7 before = () => {8 var spec = new AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass();9 spec.setup();10 spec.before_each();11 };12 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");13 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");14 };15 }16}17using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;18class describe_async_after_throws : nspec {19 void when_async_after_throws() {20 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");21 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");22 context["AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass"] = () => {23 act = () => {24 var spec = new AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass();25 spec.setup();26 spec.before_each();27 spec.it_should_fail_this_example_because_of_async_after();28 };29 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");30 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");31 };32 }33}34using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;35class describe_async_after_throws : nspec {36 void when_async_after_throws() {37 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");38 it["should fail this example because of async after"] = () => "1".should_be("1");39 context["AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass"] = () => {40 act = () => {
AsyncAfterThrowsSpecClass
Using AI Code Generation
1using System.Threading.Tasks;2using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;3{4 {5 {6 void method_level_context()7 {8 afterAsync = async () =>9 {10 await Task.Delay(1);11 throw new AfterException();12 };13 it["should fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");14 it["should also fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");15 }16 }17 public void should_fail_each_example()18 {19 Run(typeof(SpecClass));20 TheContext("method level context").AllExamples().ShouldFail();21 }22 }23}24using System.Threading.Tasks;25using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;26{27 {28 {29 void method_level_context()30 {31 afterAsync = async () =>32 {33 await Task.Delay(1);34 throw new AfterException();35 };36 it["should fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");37 it["should also fail this example because of afterAsync"] = () => "1".should_be("1");38 }39 }40 public void should_fail_each_example()41 {42 Run(typeof(SpecClass));43 TheContext("method level context").AllExamples().ShouldFail();44 }45 }46}47using System.Threading.Tasks;48using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.Exceptions;49{50 {
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
If you own a website or mobile app, the best way to find out what’s going to work, what’s currently working, and what’s not of any use, is to use a customer insight and analytics tool for your product. These tools will give you insights related to how your user is interacting with your website/app, what is the workflow and user behaviour behind every conversion, and how you can better improve your interaction with your end users.
A challenge that many developers face in Selenium test automation is choosing the right test framework that can help them come up with automated tests with minimal (or no) requirement of boilerplate code. Like me, most of you would have come across test code where a huge chunk of code is written to perform a simple test.
Being web developers, we are hardly satisfied by the dimensions of our elements on the web page. What if I could increase that image width to 30px more? Or maybe 20%? Deciding the final width at the end now requires us to adjust the height as well! What if multiple elements were to be adjusted according to the new values like in a CSS-grid or subgrid structure? This is where the CSS aspect ratio comes into play.
A front-end web developer crafts a web page keeping in mind the viewers’ current trends and interests. Two decades ago, the options and technologies were limited. But today, the story has changed. There are a lot of tools and opportunities for a front-end web developer to consider. The usage of these tools increases the complexities of the overall arrangement while allowing a developer’s comfort area. There is a need to have a tool like LT Browser to help a web developer analyze his mistakes, provide a real-time view of the multiple devices, and help him understand how his web application might perform in the market.
Being in the software industry you may have often heard the term code review. However, the concept of code reviewing is often misunderstood. Often it is overlooked in the software development life cycle as people feel performing testing should suffice the validation process. And so, they tend to turn a blind eye towards the code reviewing process. However, neglecting code reviewing process could bounce back with major consequences to deal with. We also have a misconception that code reviewing process is a responsibility for the development team alone. It is not! Code reviewing is a process that should involve not only developers but QAs and product managers too. This article is my attempt to help you realize the importance of code review and how as QA you should be participating in it. We will also look into code review best practices and code review checklist for test automation.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!