Best NSpec code snippet using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter.before_all_sampleSpec
improperly_formed_context_methods.cs
...5{6 [TestFixture]7 public class improperly_formed_context_methods : when_running_specs8 {9 class before_all_sampleSpec : nspec10 {11 public static List<string> sequence = new List<string>();12 void a_regular_context_method()13 {14 //this context method wraps everything in lambdas (as context methods should),15 //because it's behavior is deferred using lambdas, it is run after the methods declared below.16 it["uses lambdas"] = () => sequence.Add("a_regular_context_method");17 }18 void messed_up_context()19 {20 //this contrived context method really should have everything wrapped in lambdas21 sequence.Add("messed_up_context");22 }23 void before_all()24 {25 //this is a properly crafted class level method, without lambda26 sequence.Add("before_all");27 }28 void another_messed_up_context()29 {30 //this context method should also have everything wrapped in lambdas31 //notice, it would sort alphabetically before the before_all method32 sequence.Add("another_messed_up_context");33 }34 }35 [Test]36 public void it_runs_things_in_a_strange_order()37 {38 before_all_sampleSpec.sequence = new List<string>();39 Run(typeof (before_all_sampleSpec));40 //the two improperly crafted context methods are executed first in the order they were declared41 //while nspec is building up its model of contexts and examples42 //then the class level before and properly crafted spec (wrapped in lambda) is executed.43 //The moral of the story is context methods that don't have their behavior wrapped44 //in lambdas (incorrectly so), run in the order that they are declared (disregarding alphabetical ordering).45 //FYI, alphabetical ordering can easily be implemented in the 'Methods' extension method.46 before_all_sampleSpec.sequence.Should().Equal(47 new[] { "messed_up_context", "another_messed_up_context", "before_all", "a_regular_context_method" });48 }49 }50}...
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;7{8 {9 void before_all()10 {11 beforeAll = true;12 }13 void before_each()14 {15 beforeEach = true;16 }17 void after_each()18 {19 afterEach = true;20 }21 void after_all()22 {23 afterAll = true;24 }25 void before_and_after_all_spec()26 {27 it["should have run before_all"] = () => beforeAll.should_be_true();28 it["should have run before_each"] = () => beforeEach.should_be_true();29 it["should have run after_each"] = () => afterEach.should_be_true();30 it["should have run after_all"] = () => afterAll.should_be_true();31 }32 }33}34using System;35using System.Collections.Generic;36using System.Linq;37using System.Text;38using System.Threading.Tasks;39using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;40{41 {42 void before_all()43 {44 beforeAll = true;45 }46 void before_each()47 {48 beforeEach = true;49 }50 void after_each()51 {52 afterEach = true;53 }54 void after_all()55 {56 afterAll = true;57 }58 void before_and_after_each_spec()59 {60 it["should have run before_all"] = () => beforeAll.should_be_true();61 it["should have run before_each"] = () => beforeEach.should_be_true();62 it["should have run after_each"] = () => afterEach.should_be_true();63 it["should have run after_all"] = () => afterAll.should_be_true();64 }65 }66}67using System;68using System.Collections.Generic;69using System.Linq;70using System.Text;71using System.Threading.Tasks;
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;2{3 {4 public void before_each()5 {6 beforeAllSpecs = new before_all_sampleSpec();7 }8 }9}
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;2using NSpec;3{4 void before_each()5 {6 before = () => "before";7 act = () => "act";8 it["should run before each example"] = () => before().should_be("before");9 it["should run act for each example"] = () => act().should_be("act");10 }11}12using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;13using NSpec;14{15 void before_each()16 {17 before = () => "before";18 act = () => "act";19 it["should run before each example"] = () => before().should_be("before");20 it["should run act for each example"] = () => act().should_be("act");21 }22}23using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;24using NSpec;25{26 void before_each()27 {28 before = () => "before";29 act = () => "act";30 it["should run before each example"] = () => before().should_be("before");31 it["should run act for each example"] = () => act().should_be("act");32 }33}34using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;35using NSpec;36{37 void before_each()38 {39 before = () => "before";40 act = () => "act";41 it["should run before each example"] = () => before().should_be("before");42 it["should run act for each example"] = () => act().should_be("act");43 }44}
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;2using NSpec;3{4 void before_each()5 {6 beforeAllSampleSpec = new before_all_sampleSpec();7 }8}9using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;10using NSpec;11{12 void before_each()13 {14 beforeEachSampleSpec = new before_each_sampleSpec();15 }16}17using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;18using NSpec;19{20 void before_each()21 {22 beforeAndAfterAllSampleSpec = new before_and_after_all_sampleSpec();23 }24}25using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;26using NSpec;27{28 void before_each()29 {30 beforeAndAfterEachSampleSpec = new before_and_after_each_sampleSpec();31 }32}33using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;34using NSpec;35{36 void before_each()37 {38 beforeAllAndAfterAllSampleSpec = new before_all_and_after_all_sampleSpec();39 }40}41using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;42using NSpec;43{44 void before_each()45 {46 beforeAllAndAfterEachSampleSpec = new before_all_and_after_each_sampleSpec();47 }48}
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using System;2using System.Collections.Generic;3using System.Linq;4using System.Text;5using System.Threading.Tasks;6using NSpec;7using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs;8{9 {10 private static int beforeAllCount = 0;11 private static int beforeCount = 0;12 private static int exampleCount = 0;13 private static int afterCount = 0;14 private static int afterAllCount = 0;15 void before_all()16 {17 beforeAllCount++;18 }19 void before()20 {21 beforeCount++;22 }23 void it_should_run_before_all_once()24 {25 beforeAllCount.should_be(1);26 }27 void it_should_run_before_each_example()28 {29 beforeCount.should_be(1);30 }31 void it_should_run_example()32 {33 exampleCount++;34 }35 void it_should_run_after_each_example()36 {37 afterCount++;38 }39 void after()40 {41 afterCount++;42 }43 void after_all()44 {45 afterAllCount++;46 }47 }48}49using System;50using System.Collections.Generic;51using System.Linq;52using System.Text;53using System.Threading.Tasks;54using NSpec;55using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs;56{57 {58 private static int beforeAllCount = 0;59 private static int beforeCount = 0;60 private static int exampleCount = 0;61 private static int afterCount = 0;62 private static int afterAllCount = 0;63 void before_all()64 {65 beforeAllCount++;66 }67 void before()68 {69 beforeCount++;70 }71 void it_should_run_before_all_once()72 {73 beforeAllCount.should_be(1);74 }75 void it_should_run_before_each_example()76 {77 beforeCount.should_be(1);78 }79 void it_should_run_example()80 {81 exampleCount++;82 }83 void it_should_run_after_each_example()84 {85 afterCount++;86 }
before_all_sampleSpec
Using AI Code Generation
1using NSpec;2using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;3{4 static void Main(string[] args)5 {6 var runner = new nspec();7 runner.Run(typeof(before_all_sampleSpec));8 }9}10using NSpec;11using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;12{13 static void Main(string[] args)14 {15 var runner = new nspec();16 runner.Run(typeof(before_each_sampleSpec));17 }18}19using NSpec;20using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;21{22 static void Main(string[] args)23 {24 var runner = new nspec();25 runner.Run(typeof(after_all_sampleSpec));26 }27}28using NSpec;29using NSpec.Tests.WhenRunningSpecs.BeforeAndAfter;30{31 static void Main(string[] args)32 {33 var runner = new nspec();34 runner.Run(typeof(after_each_sampleSpec));35 }36}
Check out the latest blogs from LambdaTest on this topic:
If you own a website or mobile app, the best way to find out what’s going to work, what’s currently working, and what’s not of any use, is to use a customer insight and analytics tool for your product. These tools will give you insights related to how your user is interacting with your website/app, what is the workflow and user behaviour behind every conversion, and how you can better improve your interaction with your end users.
A challenge that many developers face in Selenium test automation is choosing the right test framework that can help them come up with automated tests with minimal (or no) requirement of boilerplate code. Like me, most of you would have come across test code where a huge chunk of code is written to perform a simple test.
Being web developers, we are hardly satisfied by the dimensions of our elements on the web page. What if I could increase that image width to 30px more? Or maybe 20%? Deciding the final width at the end now requires us to adjust the height as well! What if multiple elements were to be adjusted according to the new values like in a CSS-grid or subgrid structure? This is where the CSS aspect ratio comes into play.
A front-end web developer crafts a web page keeping in mind the viewers’ current trends and interests. Two decades ago, the options and technologies were limited. But today, the story has changed. There are a lot of tools and opportunities for a front-end web developer to consider. The usage of these tools increases the complexities of the overall arrangement while allowing a developer’s comfort area. There is a need to have a tool like LT Browser to help a web developer analyze his mistakes, provide a real-time view of the multiple devices, and help him understand how his web application might perform in the market.
Being in the software industry you may have often heard the term code review. However, the concept of code reviewing is often misunderstood. Often it is overlooked in the software development life cycle as people feel performing testing should suffice the validation process. And so, they tend to turn a blind eye towards the code reviewing process. However, neglecting code reviewing process could bounce back with major consequences to deal with. We also have a misconception that code reviewing process is a responsibility for the development team alone. It is not! Code reviewing is a process that should involve not only developers but QAs and product managers too. This article is my attempt to help you realize the importance of code review and how as QA you should be participating in it. We will also look into code review best practices and code review checklist for test automation.
Learn to execute automation testing from scratch with LambdaTest Learning Hub. Right from setting up the prerequisites to run your first automation test, to following best practices and diving deeper into advanced test scenarios. LambdaTest Learning Hubs compile a list of step-by-step guides to help you be proficient with different test automation frameworks i.e. Selenium, Cypress, TestNG etc.
You could also refer to video tutorials over LambdaTest YouTube channel to get step by step demonstration from industry experts.
Get 100 minutes of automation test minutes FREE!!